Silence Is Golden, Enough Honesty To Socialized Signals.

Big data expert, Arrakis pant, the father of wearable devices, wrote a book detailing the research results of the wearable social signal measuring instrument he made. The book, entitled "the signal of honesty", presents a bold and logical view: people do not communicate with each other without language, and people send out socialized signals without language. Before the advent of language, this is how human beings communicate. The reason is obvious that the most basic and important information of human beings does not need to be passed through language. Otherwise, human beings can not survive and reproduce before they appear. Language may only be used to confirm people's understanding of signals. Real signals (unconsciousness) are more believable than words. The socialized signals emitted by people are more difficult to fake. A woman knows that a man in front of him can feel his affection for him, but deliberately says, "I am not interested in you. It is a conscious rebellion in language, and the signal she sent before is the real meaning."

In studying Vernon Smith's new HUMANOMICS, I agree with a view that behavioral economics research shows that people's daily life and beliefs can not even follow the simplest logic rule (bounded rationality), but people in the group usually obey their social rules highly. The latter sentence is actually Adam Simy's core hypothesis of human behavior theory.

Brain neuroscience and modern psychological research have found a lot of evidence to support this view. When people contact with others, they automatically send out signals, which are sociable and can be perceived and interpreted by others. The other person can judge your intentions according to the perceived signals, and make predictions for your actions. This is what Smith calls "Empathy", so most people's conscious behavior comes from observing the subtle influence of others, so it is not surprising that different people behave alike. In the empathy mechanism, the brain mirror neurons directly read the behavior of others from all parts of the brain. It has the ability to instantly interpret and respond to signals. Mirror neurons help people unconsciously synchronize actions, match sounds, automatically respond to laughter, and coordinate actions with others. This kind of socialization consciousness is the core of human construction and development thought. People use these responses to unconsciously interpret social behavior. Children's learning of social skills is based on imitating others' Socialized signals, and even adults' learning and working skills rely heavily on this implicit learning method. Everyone's signal is spread in the social network, and ultimately changes the behavior of the whole society.

Psychology has an in-depth discussion of the analogy between brain system 1 (quick thinking) and system 2 (slow thinking). Kahneman has made an in-depth exposition of this. The daily activity of the brain is consistent with the unconscious signal response pattern. This is a consensus in the field of brain science and psychology. Data from socialized measurement experiments also show that most human behaviors are either spontaneous or involuntary, not that conscious processes do not work, but that most of our daily activities tend to be driven by unconscious processes (system 1). Research by Dijksterhuis et al also shows that unconscious thinking is often more effective than conscious thinking. For simple tasks, conscious decisions are better. For more complex problems, unconscious instincts react better. The reason is that it is difficult for a conscious mind to make the best trade-off in a moment. Unconscious thinking can integrate large amounts of information and make general judgments.

Mark Buchanan said, "when we are confronted with information overload, unconscious thinking will happen." The fact is that the information that human brain can process at unit time is very limited, and the brain is in the state of information overload at any time. Herbert Simon pointed out that intuition (unconscious decision) is just recognition. Unconscious decision-making ability stems from those skills we are good at, and relies on the extraction of memory and patterns. The study of pantland found that people's choice of judgment has nothing to do with rational logic. It is difficult for human beings to accurately and accurately depict the complexity of reality with language and mathematics, so relying on logic is inefficient. Super experts are just lucky. The probability of guessing the next question is not higher than that of ordinary people. This gives us an important revelation: when people make judgments, they rely more on the conjunction between current problems and historical experience. The best decision strategy is to focus on discovering information and subconsciously identifying the best choice. Rich experience (experience), knowledge (including data, information) and skills (daily activities and training) are very important. The unconscious, which is all inclusive of the unconscious, especially the network composed of interest individuals, is a powerful decision-making tool.

As far as the socialized signal measuring instrument in the book can interfere with people's lives (such as social measuring instruments for drawing social networks, or drawing organization or group's "structural diagrams" to improve organization's communication efficiency), such topics relate to social ethics. The mystery of cognition is being solved.