US Textile Organization Said: Imports Of Clothing From China Increased Significantly.

NCTO said that imports of trousers, underwear and shirts increased by 36% in January 2009 compared with January 2008, although the global import of such products in the United States showed a downward trend.

NCTO said they listed 63 "export subsidies" which directly contradict the statement of the Chinese government. The Chinese government said in a statement that China would not introduce new "predatory means".

Monitoring mechanism.

In October last year, the house ways and Means Committee instructed the International Trade Commission to monitor 34 products previously controlled by quotas to see if there was a surge in imports of these products after the cancellation of the quota.

Johnson said the current growth in imports is a sign of constructive growth in those subsidized imports.

An additional report points out that the ITA will launch clothing surveillance, focusing on clothing prices from China and Vietnam to see if there are illegal pricing products in these countries and whether they are dumping on the US market.

If there is indeed a dumping phenomenon, DOC may automatically initiate an anti-dumping case.

Strong objections from importers, they claimed that the existence of these arrangements created trouble in procurement.

In a letter to the leaders of the house and Senate, the National Retail Federation, the American Apparel and Footwear Association, the retail industry leaders Association and the American textile and clothing Importers Association urged the Congress not to approve the surveillance plan, because the special arrangement creates instability for the market, and when the consumer price continues to rise and businesses are struggling to maintain procurement and sales, they also need to ensure their employees are employed.

They also criticized the implementation of surveillance procedures as a cost to taxpayers, who said that surveillance arrangements were unnecessary and unnecessary procedures, and were not in accordance with US laws and international obligations.

When and how to implement the surveillance process, the word is not yet written off, because neither the DOC chief nor the chief executive of the US trade representative office is in place. They will not take action before they thoroughly review the US trade policy.